<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woktenna</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Herrick</title>
		<link>http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlherrick.com/dev/?p=88#comment-52</guid>
		<description>I imagine it would work fine. The only consideration I would take in to account is the different frequencies that 3G operates on (800/1900 MHz etc.). Also, I think for practical reasons, you would probably only use this from a fixed location with the frequency of your local tower already known. Would the focal point math have to be a little different than if using 2.4/5 GHz WIFI?

Here&#039;s someone who has done it: &lt;a href=&quot;http://geobray.com/2010/02/07/woktenna-for-3g/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://geobray.com/2010/02/07/woktenna-for-3g/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine it would work fine. The only consideration I would take in to account is the different frequencies that 3G operates on (800/1900 MHz etc.). Also, I think for practical reasons, you would probably only use this from a fixed location with the frequency of your local tower already known. Would the focal point math have to be a little different than if using 2.4/5 GHz WIFI?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s someone who has done it: <a href="http://geobray.com/2010/02/07/woktenna-for-3g/" rel="nofollow">http://geobray.com/2010/02/07/woktenna-for-3g/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulu</title>
		<link>http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlherrick.com/dev/?p=88#comment-51</guid>
		<description>How does it work with a 3G modem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does it work with a 3G modem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WLAN: Günstig mehr Reichweite &#124; Bloggergruppe.de</title>
		<link>http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>WLAN: Günstig mehr Reichweite &#124; Bloggergruppe.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlherrick.com/dev/?p=88#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] an. Für sogenannte &#8220;Woktennas&#8221; reicht aber auch etwas handwerkliches Geschick: http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/ http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/    Categories: Allgemeines Tags:         Kommentare (0) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an. Für sogenannte &#8220;Woktennas&#8221; reicht aber auch etwas handwerkliches Geschick: <a href="http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/" rel="nofollow">http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/</a> <a href="http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/" rel="nofollow">http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/</a>    Categories: Allgemeines Tags:         Kommentare (0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Herrick</title>
		<link>http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Herrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlherrick.com/dev/?p=88#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I acquired this wok lid from a friend who was willing to part with it. Prior to receiving it, I don&#039;t think I have ever spent so much time in the cookware section of the department stores around where I live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I acquired this wok lid from a friend who was willing to part with it. Prior to receiving it, I don&#8217;t think I have ever spent so much time in the cookware section of the department stores around where I live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://karlherrick.com/dev/2006/02/10/woktenna/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karlherrick.com/dev/?p=88#comment-48</guid>
		<description>How does performance compare with your cantenna?  Or maybe that&#039;s an apples and oranges comparison because you&#039;re using the USB dongle and connecting the cantenna to a totally different adapter.

Anyhow using a wok cover is a great idea.  Bet it&#039;s aluminum, which is probably better than steel for this.  Do they sell these covers separate from woks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does performance compare with your cantenna?  Or maybe that&#8217;s an apples and oranges comparison because you&#8217;re using the USB dongle and connecting the cantenna to a totally different adapter.</p>
<p>Anyhow using a wok cover is a great idea.  Bet it&#8217;s aluminum, which is probably better than steel for this.  Do they sell these covers separate from woks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

